The following web-page is frozen and archived as
http://archive.is/NI8HrThe
same text that a "Douglas Hillford" posted in the thread 8772 of the
TG-1 was on the very same day posted in the blog of the criminal Dewayne
Lee Smith, but with the name "M.B." for the author.
If the "Delta Institute has nothing to hide", why then does Dewayne Lee Smith use two different names?
So we have one more piece of proof by Smith himself that he is a fraud.
http://www.bxprotocol.com/blog.php?id=60[*quote*]
Why Delta Institute has nothing to hide
Jan 28, 2016, by M. B.A
coworker recently introduced me to the BX Protocol. I had never heard
of the Delta Institute or the BX Protocol so I felt it was important to
do thorough research. After all, I am a recent graduate who just
completed a four year degree program. Critical thinking has become a
large part of who I am. While I always appreciate information that is
provided to me, I like to draw my own conclusions based on my
independent research. I do not make any decision lightly. I am an
over-thinker. I look at every possible angle before coming to a
conclusion. I often describe myself as an optimistic skeptic. I always
seek to find the good, but I remain skeptical until I have enough
information to form an educated opinion.
My coworker, knowing my
skepticism, encouraged me to conduct my own research so I could draw my
own conclusion. My first stop was the company website. I started by
clicking on every tab and reviewing every link, video, and document. I
took notes on anything I questioned so I could conduct my own
independent research using scholarly sources. I evaluated their
marketing and testimonials. I conducted web searches to see what others
were saying. At the end of my research, I concluded that while I didn’t
fully understand how the BX Protocol worked, why it works scientifically
makes sense to me. Results from their independent research are
presented on their website and I was able to find sources that helped me
make sense of why they conducted the study the way they did. The fact
that there are no peer-reviewed articles mattered very little to me. I
could scientifically validate why they conducted the research.
One
thing that stood out to me is the fact that there seems to be some
obvious attacks against the creators of the BX Protocol. Naturally, my
curiosity was peaked. I always assume the person or group making the
attacks must honestly believe they are protecting consumers. After all,
they must emphatically believe the company is doing harm if they are
going through so much trouble to discredit the company. I began
researching every claim made to see if there was any validity. What I
found was disturbing and did nothing but show me that these attacks are
not being carried out to protect the interests of consumers. I don’t
often refer to others’ viewpoints as propaganda. It is not a term I just
throw around. However, in this case, my research showed me that the
information being spread meets the very definition of propaganda. It is
being used to mislead those who are interested in the BX Protocol and
doing them a great disservice.
The way I see it, there have been
some valid questions asked by various sources regarding the science
behind the protocol, how the program works, who runs the program, what
their credentials are, if the program is a scam, and various other
rational questions. The Delta Institute always provides a professional
answer and often explains how to find additional information. When
personal attacks against employees have been made (like accusations that
they are criminals) they provided a formal response. They did not hide
anything and explained the true nature of the situation. This spoke
volumes to me. Any time someone resorts to attacks of this nature,
especially when they are spreading false allegations, they discredit
themselves to me. I found it despicable that a claim was made that an
individual died because they chose the protocol over chemotherapy when
the page they cited provided evidence that the person did choose
chemotherapy. My impression is that this is a blatant attempt to
discredit the organization by spreading deceitful information.
I
could go on and on about the claims being made and how I found them to
be untrue. Rather than do that, I encourage those who are skeptical to
conduct their own research and draw their own conclusion. Use credible
sources and do not rely on Wikipedia pages. Wikipedia’s own disclaimer
mentions that information on Wikipedia is contributed by anyone who
wants to post material and that the expertise of the poster is not taken
into consideration. When using Wikipedia as a source, you may be
reading information that is outdated, posted by someone who isn’t an
expert in the field, or someone who simply wants to provide
misinformation.
M. B., Guest Blogger26 Likes
Privacy Policy | Contact Us | Disclaimer
© 2016 Delta Institute International. All rights reserved - Domestic & Foreign.
Powered by Delta Institute VESp™ a Virtual Enterprise Software processor.
[*/quote*]
Thanks for your fingerprints.